University website rankings, Dalai Lama controversy

George Bush and Dalai Lama

In 2007 Bush presented the Congressional Gold Medal to The Dalai Lama. (White house photo, Wikimedia Commons)

What will weigh more in the long run for a university’s reputation, the rhetoric of university rankings via such things as website hits, or the Chinese sanctioning of a university that awards the Dalai Lama an honorary degree?

Popular vote by clicking a mouse, or government sanctions?

Take, for example, The University of Calgary — There’s an interesting contrast in their status in two university news stories today.

One story is about the Dalai Lama honorary degree controversy.

Screenshot of top 10 Canadian universities according to

Screenshot of top 10 Canadian universities' webistes, according to

The other is a story in which we can see the university’s reputation measured by the popularity of its website.

They are both stories about a university’s ethos and how much it weighs politically and economically.

But these big news stories and ranking systems filter down to the level of individuals using rhetoric online, authoring online content  for educational purposes.  I conclude with some thoughts on how my own and others’ instructional website authoring may contribute to reputational rankings and international visibility.

I’ve divided this into 3 Separate posts:   Dalai Lama Controversy, University Website Rankings,  and University Website Rankings and Course Sites


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s